Malzeme Bilimi

[Explanation1]: Language:
The author has been informed about the nature and relevance of revision made here through a remark.

[Explanation2]: Language:
The redundancy has been eliminated.

[Explanation3]: Language:
The phrase has been made concise.

[Explanation4]: Subject area:
A precise technical phrase has replaced the wordy expression.

[Explanation5]: Language & typographical error:
To achieve fluency, the phrase has been restructured and the spelling error has been corrected.

[Explanation6]: Language:
The sentence has been reframed for a robust expression and author stance.

[Explanation7]: Language:
The phrasal verb has been replaced with an academic word choice for accuracy and conciseness.

[Explanation8]: Style:
The abbreviation has already been defined earlier in the text.

[Explanation9]: Language:
The sentence has been restructured to enhance readability.

[Explanation10]: Content accuracy:
Crucial information has been corrected as per the study.

[Explanation11]: Language:
The awkward word order has been corrected.

[Explanation12]: Attention to detail:
Placing a semicolon here has made the sentence readable.

[Explanation13]: Language:
Technical writing calls for a discipline-specific academic vocabulary, and hence the original has been replaced with formal academic language.

[Explanation14]: Style:
The revised spelling conforms to American English convention.

[Explanation15]: Language:
The content has been made readable and clear.

[Explanation16]: Language:
The lengthy noun string has been rephrased for clarity and readability.

[Explanation17]: Language:
The sentence has been restructured to cohere with the context and redundancy has been eliminated.

[Explanation18]: Language:
The information in this sentence contrasts that of the preceding one. Hence, an appropriate transition word has been added.

[Explanation19]: Language:
Through a remark, the author is informed of content that needs to be corroborated and presented.